🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to reinitiate atomic talks with Washington as long as it is treated with "respect" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has declared.

Abbas Araghchi stated exclusively dialogue produced results, and disclosed fresh requests had been made by go-betweens to restart talks with the US government. He claimed Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Iran was not yet able to authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to access struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Navigating a Challenging Course

Araghchi is treading a challenging course since Iran wishes not to appear to be proceeding from a stance of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged stronger militarily and mentally from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material domestically that it will never give up" – the key factor of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Prior Discussions Abruptly Concluded

The earlier sessions of discussions between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter end on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with Donald Trump asserting the locations had been eliminated. Afterward, European countries used their right to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Proposed

Iran's diplomats stated they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the talks that American atomic experts could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Diplomats asserted repeatedly they had secured an understanding with the US representative the US official only for the deal to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Position

Iranian officials said the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be resurrected in some form if discussions resume.

The US president in recent days said he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but in private Iran's diplomats state they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from America either directly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of inactivity in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran asserts dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his remarks to the gathering, intended to portray the US as a controlling nation that exploits the notion of worldwide standards, Araghchi declared the two-week conflict showed the conflict could not be resolved by armed force. He stated the assaults started with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were mounted with complete American awareness and coordination, making faith difficult to restore.

Diplomacy Stays the Primary Resolution

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had fled diplomacy; it was America and the European states that had always tried to enforce their desires during the discussions. Diplomacy can still be active and stays the ultimate solution to resolve disputes, but its requirements, rules and fundamentals must be respected."

"Provided that they speak to the Iranian people with the language of dignity and respect, they will receive a response in the equivalent language."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is described by Iranian officials as the conflict of recovery and rebuilding, the foreign minister claimed he was certain Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We gained many lessons from this engagement; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He added: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to eliminate, stays intact. The facilities and equipment, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is essential is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to destroy. The Iranian people have developed stronger, more cohesive, and more supportive of the administration and the country in the face of this invasion."